How many people think about the ''KNOWLEDGE''? As we acquire knowledge from different sources in our day to day life, we ourselves does not think what is that knowledge? How it has come? Why it has come? What is the result after getting that knowledge etc..
But today there is a very big challange among the people to remember the knowledge they have acquired. So what is the tool, technique, way, to remember that knowledge? Can anybody think a solution, which is everlasting, permanant, easily accessible?
Whatever i think, i'm writing here. If anybody have any objections, clarifications, please let me know.
In the past also there was a KNOWLEDGE EXPLOSION. What were the techniques used by our ancestors to remember the knowledge? There is a sentence which is very well-known to all Sanskrit scholars - UKTAM HI VIDUSHAAM LOKE SAMAASA-VYAASA DHAARANAM - which means nothing but knowledge compression and knowledge expansion.
If you see our ancient texts, in many texts you come across many formule - SUTRAs, which will explain many things. If you elaborate that Sutra, you can understand the whole text. Knowldge is compressed in the form of Sutras and it is explained in the form of commentary to those Sutras.
But, when the education trend is moving in western system or just bread earning education, or for the sake of just getting the good marks in exams etc, how our education will sustain or how we can sustain in this world, in the present condition?
If we propagate this technique in our daily life, that too especially in educational system, i hope we can make some good results, we can acheive something in our life for the betterment of our life. But who will take some responsibility to propagate this? Who will explain these things to the lay-man? How can we reach these techniques to all the people all over the world?
Users Visited us >>
eAnveshan e-mail Login
Comments
Knowledge- applications of a technlogy.
October 7, 2009 by C.S.Moorthy, 42 weeks 3 days ago
Comment id: 219
Dear Sir, We have already seen that there is a difference between transactional and transcendental knowledge. You can see a parallel in theoretical and applied science. They are two different things. Pursuing your aspiration in one area will conflict with the other. If you are keen on transactional knowledge, whether, philosophy, religion, science, business, medicine etc., you have to forget any progress in transcendental knowledge. Methodology/Technology is important only in transactional world. In transactional world you look for profit/gain and consolidate the ego. Profit need not necessarily be cash, it is any action of self-advancement. In transcendental there is no method or technology,or application of ancient or modern techniques. In sanskrit the transcendental knowledge is known as Brahma Yajna. Brahma means the Para Brahman and yajna means journey. Journey towards awareness of Parabrahman. You should also be aware, that in Western system they employ 'the formula' for precisely the same purpose that you quoted in sanskrit, with same or better results!
With Love .
To Murthyji,
October 3, 2009 by maananth_anveshana, 43 weeks 15 hours ago
Comment id: 214
I'm very happy & enthusiastic read your articles on Knowledge. But i want to tell you about myself. I have heard & read about knowledge etc through Shastras etc. I have completed my Tarka Vidvat in Sanskrit college, mysore. So, i think you can understand about myself.
My question is, now a days, in the teaching methodology, y dont we use our ancient system to memorize the difficult chapters of any field, as i told early 'UKTAM HI VIDUSHAM LOKE SAMASAVYASADHARANAM'. Compression of the knowledge & decompression of it. As formulae of Panini, Kanada, Gautama etc & their commentaries like Mahabhashya, Prashastapada Bhasya etc. So Please how we can propogate this system into layman's education, so that he can use these techniques to memorize all the difficult subjects easily?
Knowledge- applications of a technlogy.
October 6, 2009 by C.S.Moorthy, 42 weeks 4 days ago
Comment id: 218
(No subject)
October 6, 2009 by C.S.Moorthy, 42 weeks 4 days ago
Comment id: 217
Knowledge-III
September 14, 2009 by C. S. Moorthy, 45 weeks 5 days ago
Comment id: 197
Here we are going to consider the final aspect of
” knowledge.”
As we have seen, book knowledge and experience are necessary for transactional knowledge
so that we can live comfortably in this world. We also need to depend on knowledge of others
to meet some of our challenges in life, such as those of doctors, lawyers, engineers, accountants
and bankers. However much, such knowledge is made available to us, personal issues would not be addressed by the knowledge. Your anxieties, fears, hopes, aspirations, desires and relationships cannot be addressed by this knowledge. The knowledge in short is impersonal.
There are then books on personal aspects that promise to alleviate your anguish. They solve one problem, but bring in its wake many others. This is so because they follow a partial approach. Your total personality needs to be addressed in order to sublimate the problem. Since transcendental knowledge addresses the personal aspect of a person, it was found very convenient by religions, to use this transcendental knowledge through books, impressive speeches, stories and what not to convert you to a life long allegiance to their doctrine of personal development. It has been found that they maim you and you live a handicapped life thereafter. You live in an illusion thereafter. One example will suffice. You know the religious books advise you that the ego has to be sublimated. After reading such books and after some practices prescribed therein, many start feeling that they have eschewed ego, but it raises its ugly head when suitable circumstances surface. Not a single soul has so far done away with his ego after reading scriptures or religious books. As second best, some of the books suggest that your ego is so sharpened that it is ready for being obliterated by the Lord. Then there are those who tell that the best way is Sharana Gathi, surrender to the Lord totally along with the ego. Of course that is not the way of knowledge but denying it. Such people contend that knowledge makes you ego-centric. Anyway, knowledge is not helpful to you personally except for earning a livelihood. Strictly speaking, knowledge is only transactional.
We are, in fact, speaking of two different things when we consider knowledge. There is’ knowledge’ and ‘knowing.’ Knowledge is an accumulation process. You gather knowledge and store it in your mind. When you find a need for it you retrieve it for application. It is a process pertaining to the mind and stimulated by thought. On the other hand, knowing is an ongoing process. It is also a process of learning. It needs only your attention. What is that attention? That attention is that of the Consciousness. It calls for total attention. When you give partial attention, as we generally do, the mind intervenes and high jacks the event into the knowledge field! See this happening in you, it is very interesting. How does the mind highjack? It will use the tools of comparison and judgment; analysis; likes and dislikes; agreement or disagreement; and conviction and non-conviction before storing the information.
For living in this world earning a livelihood; for decoration; earning acceptability in the social ladder;
boosting one’s ego; knowledge is very handy. For seeking the inner Truth-the Paramatma, only the process of ‘knowing’ is necessary. We live in a fool’s paradise if we think that transactional knowledge will help.
------------------
Knowledge
September 9, 2009 by C. S. Moorthy, 46 weeks 3 days ago
Comment id: 194
When we talk of knowledge, one has to be very clear.
There is the mechanical aspect to knowledge like knowing once name, address, riding a cycle, two wheeler or car, constructing a building or bridge or any other engineering. activity. There is again the knowledge of diseases and their remedies of a doctor. There is knowledge of an architect and the knowledge of a scientist. There are many more like the job of an accountant, banker and salesmen. These are outputs of the human brain-a natural and healthy function. It is only a matter of degree how much you remember in your field of specialization. For unremembered portion you may refer to books or computer data and carry on your profession. These activities are necessary to keep the society healthy and prosperous. The knowledge in this area pertains to transactional aspect of man. Transaction means there is a giver and there is a receiver.
There is what is known as transcendental aspect. Here we know the giver but we have no knowledge of the receiver. The question is whether we can allow this knowledge function to interfere in our progress in transcendental aspect? First we should understand what is transcendental? In the mechanical knowledge process we saw above, experience plays an important part. It may be your personal experience or experience of others codified for your reference. That knowledge helps you to achieve good results. But the scope of the transcendental knowledge is invariably outside the purview of past experience. Each experience during your inward journey is personal and unique. Past experience and therefore knowledge will not allow you to progress. The transcendental experience is always new. On the other hand, knowledge and past experience are always old. Even what you experienced a second back is past experience in this connection. I hope you understand the implication.
Many would not agree with me. However, in this matter agreement or disagreement is hardly relevant. Either you see or you don’t see the fact. If you see the fact, you will not give any credence to tradition, gurus and the like. You are a light unto yourself. Let me hasten to add that I am not advocating that these traditions should not be observed and studied. One may even learn and follow the traditions and rituals. But one realizes for what they are worth. Then you will find some gems even in that tradition here and there!
Our society (whether it is Hindu, Buddhist, Christian or Muslim) has cleverly manipulated the transcendental knowledge for transactional purposes and institutionalized it, in the form of organized religions. You find mammoth temples, mosques, churches which are awe inspiring; many classes of mediators to God; priests, soothsayers; gala functions and a long list of dos and don’ts. We are enamored. From childhood, perhaps we have seen only this aspect of life; our education also supplements this outlook. But clearly it is a grand illusion. God is not in the temples, mosques or churches or an idol. We are clearly informed so. We are told that God is in our heart. Yet, we visit these places in search of peace of mind and the blessing of the benevolent God there. We are willing to spend lakhs of rupees on an idol when thousands continue to starve; do not have a roof over their heads. In short we have become insensitive. Hardly conducive for transcendental journey!
With Love
Knowledge 2
September 11, 2009 by C. S. Moorthy, 46 weeks 2 days ago
Comment id: 195
After I wrote my comments on knowledge the day before, I thought I should add some more, to help you understand the matter better.
Perhaps you might not have realized that what I have been saying about knowledge is a fundamental topic of Vedanta. Vedanta differentiates between Vidya and Avidya..
Vidya is transactional knowledge and Avidya is transcendental knowledge. I would paint you a picture of it.
Recently, there was a TV serial telecast in Jaya TV in Tamil. If you have seen it you will realize my presentation better. If you missed it still you can gather the gist. But do see the serial, if you get an opportunity. The name of the serial was “Engey Brahmanan?” Meaning where is a brahmin in this Bhu loka? The story was written by Cho Ramaswamy a prolific writer of great repute.
The first enactment is in Kailash (Satya Loka) Parama Shiva is sitting on his throne. The Brahma Rishi Vishwamitra approaches him with a question. Shiva already knows what Vishwamitra is going to ask because he is Universal Consciousness. The question is that the bhu loka today is in such turmoil, is there not a single brahmana to alleviate the misery there? Brahma Rishi Vasishista is standing nearby. Shiva turns to him and asks him to answer the question. When he says he cannot answer it, Lord Shiva directs Vasishta to visit Bhu loka to find out first hand.
The stage is set in and around Chennai where some Brahmin families are shown to us with their activities of daily living. There is a judge and his daughter; a prosperous business man and his wife; there is a banker and his family; there is a politician and his handy man; and a set of four Brahmins and their family. Of them three are well read in scriptures. One brahmana is a bhagavathar from Kanchipuram , well versed in scriptural anecdotes. Another brahmana is a vaishnavaite. He is an ardent Narayana devotee. He runs a Veda patashala and has a vast library of scriptural texts. He has also a printing press in which he mainly prints matters of spiritual interest and distributes it at low or free of cost. Then there are two shivaite Brahmins who are priests by profession. One of them is well read, whereas the other is less proficient in the scriptures.
The story revolves round one Ashok, who is born as the only son to the business man. He in fact is Rishi Vasishista born as a human. Since he is Brahma Rishi, he is steeped in transcendental knowledge. However, he is a misfit in the formal education in college where he is studying for a degree. His colleagues rag and deride him, but he does not mind and is always a cheerful, self contented person. The principal is unable to bear the torture the boy Ashok is put through by his class mates. Since he could not do anything else, he rusticates Ashok from college. The drama unfolds when he encounters all the personalities mentioned in the earlier paragraph, and the episodes are very telling and lively. At one stage his mother and businessman father think that Ashok is deranged and arrange psychologists and shock treatment. But to their consternation, the psychologists, perhaps because of their special knowledge become his converts. Ashok is unable to find a single brahmana. As a climax he encounters the three well read Brahmins and ask them to tell truthfully, whether they are Brahmins. When they search their conscience, the answer is negative. So Ashok returns to Kailasa with a negative reply and what is it?
There is not a single soul in the Bhuloka who pursues transcendental knowledge for its own sake so as to be called a Brahmin. In Bhu loka all are concerned with only livelihood, which means transactional knowledge. Even scriptural knowledge has been canalized for this mundane activity.
-------